On 9 August 2012 09:31, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 06:07:39PM +0100, Michel Lespinasse wrote: >> kmemleak uses a tree where each node represents an allocated memory object >> in order to quickly find out what object a given address is part of. >> However, the objects don't overlap, so rbtrees are a better choice than >> prio tree for this use. They are both faster and have lower memory overhead. >> >> Tested by booting a kernel with kmemleak enabled, loading the kmemleak_test >> module, and looking for the expected messages. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The patch looks fine to me but I'll give it a test later today and let > you know. Couldn't test it because the patch got messed up somewhere on the email path (tabs replaced with spaces). Is there a Git tree I can grab it from (or you could just send it to me separately as attachment)? Thanks, Catalin -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>