Hello, (Sasha, would it be possible to change your MUA so that it breaks long lines. It's pretty difficult to reply to.) On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:24:49AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > The hashtable uses hlist. hlist provides us with an entire family of > init functions which I'm supposed to use to initialize hlist heads. > > So while a memset(0) will work perfectly here, I consider that > cheating - it results in an uglier code that assumes to know about > hlist internals, and will probably break as soon as someone tries to > do something to hlist. I think we should stick with INIT_HLIST_HEAD(). It's not a hot path and we might add, say, debug fields or initialization magics added later. If this really matters, the right thing to do would be adding something like INIT_HLIST_HEAD_ARRAY(). Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>