On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 05:17:58PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 01:55:03PM +0100, Joey Gouly wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 12:43:02PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > Right, there's quite a lot I need to do: > > > > > > - Uncorrupt your patches > > > - Fix the conflict in the kvm selftests > > > - Drop the unnecessary ISBs > > > - Fix the ESR checking > > > - Fix the el2_setup labels > > > - Reorder the patches > > > - Drop the patch that is already in kvmarm > > > > > > Working on it... > > > > Sorry! I'm happy to rebase onto some arm64 branch if that will help, just let me know. > > Please have a look at for-next/poe (also merged into for-next/core and > for-kernelci) and let me know what I got wrong! I pulled for-next/poe and ran the test and it works fine. Also looked at the diff of my branch against your branch, and it looks fine too. Thanks for your work to get this merged! > > For Marc: I reordered the series so the KVM bits (and deps) are all the > beginning, should you need them. The branch is based on a merge of the > shared branch you created previously. > > Cheers, > > Will >
