Re: [PATCH] memory tier: fix deadlock warning while onlining pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 9/2/2024 9:37 AM, Huang, Ying wrote:
Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

[Snip]

On 8/30/2024 3:11 PM, Huang, Ying wrote:
Fixes: 823430c8e9d9 ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers")
Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu<yanfei.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
   mm/memory-tiers.c | 1 -
   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
index 4775b3a3dabe..dddcd6b38e28 100644
--- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
+++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
@@ -895,7 +895,6 @@ static int __init memory_tier_init(void)
   	WARN_ON(!node_demotion);
   #endif
   -	guard(mutex)(&memory_tier_lock);
   	/*
   	 * For now we can have 4 faster memory tiers with smaller adistance
   	 * than default DRAM tier.
Although it's not absolutely necessary, I still think that it's better
to just revert the locking change of memory_tier_init() in commit
823430c8e9d9 ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory
tiers").  That is, to use mutex_lock/unlock() and exclude
hotplug_memory_notifier() from the locked region.  Because we will
always hold memory_tier_lock when working on memory tier related data
structures in this way.

Thanks for pointing out it. Will do it as below in v2.

diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
index 4775b3a3dabe..ba3738b29cc5 100644
--- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
+++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
@@ -895,13 +895,14 @@ static int __init memory_tier_init(void)
         WARN_ON(!node_demotion);
  #endif

-       guard(mutex)(&memory_tier_lock);
+       mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock);
         /*
          * For now we can have 4 faster memory tiers with smaller adistance
          * than default DRAM tier.
          */
         default_dram_type =
         mt_find_alloc_memory_type(MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM,
  &default_memory_types);
+       mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
         if (IS_ERR(default_dram_type))
                 panic("%s() failed to allocate default DRAM tier\n",
                 __func__);



LGTM, feel free to add in the future version.

Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi Ying,

Thanks for your "Reviewed-by"! I sent the v2 last Friday evening. Could
you please reply to that thread with the "Reviewed-by"? If not, I can
send v3 and include your tag.

Thread name:
8/30/2024, 6:24 PM [PATCH v2] memory tier: fix deadlock warning while onlining pages

Best Regards,
Yanfei






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux