On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 3:33 PM David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 30.08.24 22:28, Barry Song wrote:
> > From: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > mm doesn't support non-blockable __GFP_NOFAIL allocation. Because
> > persisting in providing __GFP_NOFAIL services for non-block users
> > who cannot perform direct memory reclaim may only result in an
> > endless busy loop.
> >
> > Therefore, in such cases, the current mm-core may directly return
> > a NULL pointer:
> >
> > static inline struct page *
> > __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> > struct alloc_context *ac)
> > {
> > ...
> > if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) {
> > /*
> > * All existing users of the __GFP_NOFAIL are blockable, so warn
> > * of any new users that actually require GFP_NOWAIT
> > */
> > if (WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(!can_direct_reclaim, gfp_mask))
> > goto fail;
> > ...
> > }
> > ...
> > fail:
> > warn_alloc(gfp_mask, ac->nodemask,
> > "page allocation failure: order:%u", order);
> > got_pg:
> > return page;
> > }
> >
> > Unfortuantely, vpda does that nofail allocation under non-sleepable
> > lock. A possible way to fix that is to move the pages allocation out
> > of the lock into the caller, but having to allocate a huge number of
> > pages and auxiliary page array seems to be problematic as well per
> > Tetsuon: " You should implement proper error handling instead of
> > using __GFP_NOFAIL if count can become large."
> >
> > So I choose another way, which does not release kernel bounce pages
> > when user tries to register userspace bounce pages. Then we can
> > avoid allocating in paths where failure is not expected.(e.g in
> > the release). We pay this for more memory usage as we don't release
> > kernel bounce pages but further optimizations could be done on top.
> >
> > Fixes: 6c77ed22880d ("vduse: Support using userspace pages as bounce buffer")
> > Reviewed-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > [v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx: Refine the changelog]
> > Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
> > drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> > index 791d38d6284c..58116f89d8da 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/iova_domain.c
> > @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ static void vduse_domain_bounce(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain,
> > enum dma_data_direction dir)
> > {
> > struct vduse_bounce_map *map;
> > + struct page *page;
> > unsigned int offset;
> > void *addr;
> > size_t sz;
> > @@ -178,7 +179,10 @@ static void vduse_domain_bounce(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain,
> > map->orig_phys == INVALID_PHYS_ADDR))
> > return;
> >
> > - addr = kmap_local_page(map->bounce_page);
> > + page = domain->user_bounce_pages ?
> > + map->user_bounce_page : map->bounce_page;
> > +
> > + addr = kmap_local_page(page);
> > do_bounce(map->orig_phys + offset, addr + offset, sz, dir);
> > kunmap_local(addr);
> > size -= sz;
> > @@ -270,9 +274,8 @@ int vduse_domain_add_user_bounce_pages(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain,
> > memcpy_to_page(pages[i], 0,
> > page_address(map->bounce_page),
> > PAGE_SIZE);
> > - __free_page(map->bounce_page);
> > }
> > - map->bounce_page = pages[i];
> > + map->user_bounce_page = pages[i];
> > get_page(pages[i]);
> > }
> > domain->user_bounce_pages = true;
> > @@ -297,17 +300,17 @@ void vduse_domain_remove_user_bounce_pages(struct vduse_iova_domain *domain)
> > struct page *page = NULL;
> >
> > map = &domain->bounce_maps[i];
> > - if (WARN_ON(!map->bounce_page))
> > + if (WARN_ON(!map->user_bounce_page))
> > continue;
> >
> > /* Copy user page to kernel page if it's in use */
> > if (map->orig_phys != INVALID_PHYS_ADDR) {
> > - page = alloc_page(GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOFAIL);
> > + page = map->bounce_page;
>
> Why don't we need a kmap_local_page(map->bounce_page) here, but we might
> perform one / have performed one in vduse_domain_bounce?
I think it's another bug that needs to be fixed.
Yongji, do you want to fix this?
Thanks
>
> Maybe we should simply use
>
> memcpy_page(map->bounce_page, 0, map->user_bounce_page, 0, PAGE_SIZE)
>
> ?
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
>
