On 8/30/24 21:44, Shakeel Butt wrote: >> >> Also one thing: >> >> We should add some kernel doc for this, no? Explaining when people are >> supposed to use this, that objects from KMALLOC_NORMAL will be ignored, and >> what the return value means (including where it's faked to be true). >> > > Yes this makes sense. I will add this info similar to the kmalloc() > have. Should I send a v4 with this details? Yeah please, will replace v3 with that. Thanks
