* kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> [240830 11:05]: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > head: 985bf40edf4343dcb04c33f58b40b4a85c1776d4 > commit: 59f8f23d91921f023428e34c061e8ee88b7670c7 [7320/8126] mm: change failure of MAP_FIXED to restoring the gap on failure > config: x86_64-randconfig-x005-20230818 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240830/202408302337.xJn0kaJN-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) > compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240830/202408302337.xJn0kaJN-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408302337.xJn0kaJN-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Note: the linux-next/master HEAD 985bf40edf4343dcb04c33f58b40b4a85c1776d4 builds fine. > It may have been fixed somewhere. > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > In file included from include/linux/export.h:5, > from mm/filemap.c:13: > mm/vma.h: In function 'vms_abort_munmap_vmas': > >> mm/vma.h:173:22: error: implicit declaration of function 'vma_iter_store_gfp'; did you mean 'vma_iter_clear_gfp'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 173 | if (unlikely(vma_iter_store_gfp(vms->vmi, NULL, GFP_KERNEL))) { > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/compiler.h:77:45: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely' > 77 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) > | ^ > In file included from mm/internal.h:22, > from mm/filemap.c:52: > mm/vma.h: At top level: > >> mm/vma.h:336:19: error: static declaration of 'vma_iter_store_gfp' follows non-static declaration > 336 | static inline int vma_iter_store_gfp(struct vma_iterator *vmi, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > mm/vma.h:173:22: note: previous implicit declaration of 'vma_iter_store_gfp' with type 'int()' > 173 | if (unlikely(vma_iter_store_gfp(vms->vmi, NULL, GFP_KERNEL))) { > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > include/linux/compiler.h:77:45: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely' > 77 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) > | ^ > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors next-20240830 has a newer version of this code. The fix should have relocated the vma_iter_store_gfp() function above this function, maybe a merge resolution issue? All of this is based on v7 vs the newer v8 version, which doesn't use the vma_iter_store_gfp() call here anyways.
