Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mseal: fix mmap(FIXED) error code.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 5:09 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Jeff... come on now.
>
> Please cc- the reviewers of mm/mmap.c on these patches - that's me,
> Vlastimil and Liam. Same for mm/vma.c, mm/vma.h, mm/vma_internal.h.
>
sure, that was a small fix and I thought introduced by Pedro's commit
(which was wrong)

> And it seems like it should be pretty obvious you should cc- Liam when it's
> quite literally his code you're changing!
>
> Relevant section from MAINTAINERS:
>
> MEMORY MAPPING
> M:      Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> R:      Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx>
> R:      Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> R:      Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> L:      linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
> S:      Maintained
> W:      http://www.linux-mm.org
> T:      git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
> F:      mm/mmap.c
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:55:21PM GMT, jeffxu@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > mmap(MAP_FIXED) should return EPERM when memory is sealed.
> >
> > Fixes: 4205a39e06da ("mm/munmap: replace can_modify_mm with can_modify_vma")
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  mm/mmap.c | 5 ++++-
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> > index 80d70ed099cf..0cd0c0ef03c7 100644
> > --- a/mm/mmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> > @@ -1386,7 +1386,10 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> >               mt_on_stack(mt_detach);
> >               mas_init(&mas_detach, &mt_detach, /* addr = */ 0);
> >               /* Prepare to unmap any existing mapping in the area */
> > -             if (vms_gather_munmap_vmas(&vms, &mas_detach))
> > +             error = vms_gather_munmap_vmas(&vms, &mas_detach);
> > +             if (error == -EPERM)
> > +                     return -EPERM;
> > +             if (error)
> >                       return -ENOMEM;
>
> Can't we just return the error here?
>
> This is one for Liam, but I'm ostensibly in favour, this does seem valid!
>
> >
> >               vmg.next = vms.next;
> > --
> > 2.46.0.295.g3b9ea8a38a-goog
> >





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux