Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm: ZSWAP swap-out of mTHP folios

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Kanchana P Sridhar <kanchana.p.sridhar@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm: ZSWAP swap-out of mTHP folios
From: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 10:23:46 -0700
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx, yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx, ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx, ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx, 21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nanhai.zou@xxxxxxxxx, wajdi.k.feghali@xxxxxxxxx, vinodh.gopal@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAKEwX=POQzRoiqPSqkwDnVGH=KwyEd_vrW7XNx16cXBaLWbVUQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20240828093516.30228-1-kanchana.p.sridhar@intel.com> <CAKEwX=POQzRoiqPSqkwDnVGH=KwyEd_vrW7XNx16cXBaLWbVUQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 8:55 AM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> better by definition... I wonder if lowering the memory limit even
> further would show positive numbers? Or

... perhaps with a workload that has less cold data? or using the
zswap shrinker to off load some of these cold objects to swap?

Food for thought :)

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm: ZSWAP swap-out of mTHP folios
  - From: Sridhar, Kanchana P

References:
- [PATCH v5 0/3] mm: ZSWAP swap-out of mTHP folios
  - From: Kanchana P Sridhar
- Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm: ZSWAP swap-out of mTHP folios
  - From: Nhat Pham

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 05/17] vdso: Avoid call to memset() by getrandom
Next by Date: Re: [RESEND PATCH v1] mm/vmalloc: fix page mapping if vm_area_alloc_pages() with high order fallback to order 0
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm: ZSWAP swap-out of mTHP folios
Next by thread: RE: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm: ZSWAP swap-out of mTHP folios
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux