On 8/28/24 14:18, Christian Brauner wrote: >> > @Vlastimil, @Jens, @Linus what do you think? >> >> In the other thread you said it's best to leave such refactoring to >> maintainers and I agree and don't ask you to do the cleanup in order to get >> what you need (and we don't need to rush it either). > > I mainly didn't want to wait for that huge refactor to be done before we > get a workable solution for v6.12 since the patch isn't all that huge. > > But I'm not shying away from cleanup work I'm the cause of. > > So I'm happy to do it for v6.13 as a follow-up but I also don't want to > steal this away from you because it'll probably be a fun task to get to > port everything to struct kmem_cache_args and clean that all up. So if you want, be my guest :) Yeah could be a fun task, but I'll probably be too busy for a while now.
