On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 8:23 AM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 11:08 PM Sridhar, Kanchana P > <kanchana.p.sridhar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yeah that's a bit unfair still. Wild idea, but what about we compare > SSD without zswap (or SSD with zswap, but without this patch series so > that mTHP are not zswapped) v.s zswap-on-zram (i.e with a backing > swapfile on zram block device). > > It is stupid, I know. But let's take advantage of the fact that zram > is not charged to cgroup, pretending that its memory foot print is > empty? > > I don't know how zram works though, so my apologies if it's a stupid > suggestion :) Oh nvm, looks like that's what you're already doing. That said, the lz4 column is soooo bad still, whereas the deflate-iaa clearly shows improvement! This means it could be compressor-dependent. Can you try it with zstd?
