Re: [RESEND PATCH v1] mm/vmalloc: fix page mapping if vm_area_alloc_pages() with high order fallback to order 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 03:37:38PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 27-08-24 14:47:30, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2024 at 08:49:35AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > > 2. High-order allocations. Do you think we should not care much about
> > > > it when __GFP_NOFAIL is set? Same here, there is a fallback for order-0
> > > > if "high" fails, it is more likely NO_FAIL succeed for order-0. Thus
> > > > keeping NOFAIL for high-order sounds like not a good approach to me.
> > > 
> > > We should avoid high order allocations with GFP_NOFAIL at all cost.
> > > 
> > What do you propose here? Fail such request?
> 
> We shouldn't have any hard requirements for higher order allocations in the vmalloc
> right? In other words we can always fallback to base pages.
>
We always drop NOFAIL for high-order, if it fails we fall-back to
order-0. I got the feeling that you wanted just bail-out fully if
high-order and NOFAIL.

--
Uladzislau Rezki




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux