Re: [PATCH v2] mm/memory: Don't require head page for do_set_pmd()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 Aug 2024, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 07:22:03PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 11:06:22AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
> > > You know what I'm going to ask ;) I'm assuming that the runtime effects
> > > are "small performance optimization" and that "should we backport the
> > > fix" is "no".
> > 
> > We're going to stop using PMDs to map large folios unless the fault is
> > within the first 4KiB of the PMD.  No idea how many workloads that
> > affects, but it only needs to be backported as far as v6.8, so we
> > may as well backport it.
> 
> Hi, I am reviving this thread after noticing this comment attached
> to the fix.
> 
> If you intend to install PTE level mappings for faults that happen outside of
> the first 4KiB, I believe this will make THP support for KVM ineffective.

You can relax, it's okay: where Matthew wrote "We're going to stop...",
he was describing the runtime effects of the bug (now fixed) to Andrew,
not proposing to make a change to mess up THP support.

The fix was backported to v6.9.N, but was too late for v6.8.N EOL.

Hugh




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux