On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 11:47:45AM +0200, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 2:13 AM Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > `Box` provides the simplest way to allocate memory for a generic type
> > with one of the kernel's allocators, e.g. `Kmalloc`, `Vmalloc` or
> > `KVmalloc`.
> >
> > In contrast to Rust's `Box` type, the kernel `Box` type considers the
> > kernel's GFP flags for all appropriate functions, always reports
> > allocation failures through `Result<_, AllocError>` and remains
> > independent from unstable features.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Overall looks good to me, but I have a question:
>
> > +impl<T: 'static, A> ForeignOwnable for Box<T, A>
> > +where
> > + A: Allocator,
> > +{
> > + type Borrowed<'a> = &'a T;
> > + type BorrowedMut<'a> = &'a mut T;
> > [..]
> > + unsafe fn borrow_mut<'a>(ptr: *const core::ffi::c_void) -> &'a mut T {
> > + // SAFETY: The safety requirements of this method ensure that the pointer is valid and that
> > + // nothing else will access the value for the duration of 'a.
> > + unsafe { &mut *ptr.cast_mut().cast() }
> > + }
>
> Where does this come from? It looks like you've based the series on
> top of [1], but I dropped that patch a long time ago, and I don't see
> it in rust-dev anymore.
I comes from me rebasing onto rust-dev. When Boqun asked me to resolve the merge
conflicts a few days ago, this patch was in rust-dev. I think it disappeared two
days ago or so.
@Bonqun: Need to me to rebase again?
- Danilo
>
> Alice
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230710074642.683831-1-aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
