Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: collect the number of anon mTHP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 8:28 PM David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 18.08.24 09:58, Barry Song wrote:
> > Hi Andrew, David, Usama,
> >
> > I'm attempting to rebase this series on top of Usama's
> > [PATCH v3 0/6] mm: split underutilized THPs[1]
> >
> > However, I feel it is impossible and we might be tackling things
> > in the wrong order.
>
> Is just the ordering suboptimal (which can/will get resolved one way or
> the other), or is there something fundamental that will make this series
> here "impossible"?

i think it is just the ordering suboptimal. Ideally, mTHP counters can go
first, then the new partially_mapped feature will rebase on top of
mTHP counters.

>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux