Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: collect the number of anon mTHP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 18/08/2024 08:58, Barry Song wrote:
> Hi Andrew, David, Usama,
> 
> I'm attempting to rebase this series on top of Usama's
> [PATCH v3 0/6] mm: split underutilized THPs[1]
> 
> However, I feel it is impossible and we might be tackling things
> in the wrong order.
> 
> This series should probably come before Usama's one, as the new
> partially_mapped should be ok to handle both nr_split_deferred
> and split_deferred. That said, the new partially_mapped still has
> several unresolved issues blocking my rebase.

Hi,

I have sent a v4 [1] that resolves all outstanding issues/comments raised in v3. It has been running a production workload for 12 hours, showing good performance and 0 crashes. Hopefully it helps to solve the existing merge conflicts between my series, yours and Yu Zhaos.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240819023145.2415299-1-usamaarif642@xxxxxxxxx/

Thanks

> 
> [1]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240813120328.1275952-1-usamaarif642@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> What do you think about this?
> 
> Thanks
> Barry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux