Re: [PATCH] mm: remove migration for HugePage in isolate_single_pageblock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2024/8/16 18:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 16.08.24 06:06, Kefeng Wang wrote:
The gigantic page size may larger than memory block size, so memory
offline always fails in this case after commit b2c9e2fbba32 ("mm: make
alloc_contig_range work at pageblock granularity"),

offline_pages
   start_isolate_page_range
     start_isolate_page_range(isolate_before=true)
       isolate [isolate_start, isolate_start + pageblock_nr_pages)
     start_isolate_page_range(isolate_before=false)
       isolate [isolate_end - pageblock_nr_pages, isolate_end) pageblock
            __alloc_contig_migrate_range
           isolate_migratepages_range
             isolate_migratepages_block
               isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page
                 if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
                     return -ENOMEM;

In fact, we don't need to migrate page in page range isolation, for
memory offline path, there is do_migrate_range() to move the pages.
For contig allocation, there is another __alloc_contig_migrate_range()
after isolation to migrate the pages. So fix issue by skipping the
__alloc_contig_migrate_range() in isolate_single_pageblock().

Fixes: b2c9e2fbba32 ("mm: make alloc_contig_range work at pageblock granularity")
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/page_isolation.c | 28 +++-------------------------
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
index 39fb8c07aeb7..7e04047977cf 100644
--- a/mm/page_isolation.c
+++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
@@ -403,30 +403,8 @@ static int isolate_single_pageblock(unsigned long boundary_pfn, int flags,
              unsigned long head_pfn = page_to_pfn(head);
              unsigned long nr_pages = compound_nr(head);
-            if (head_pfn + nr_pages <= boundary_pfn) {
-                pfn = head_pfn + nr_pages;
-                continue;
-            }
-
-#if defined CONFIG_COMPACTION || defined CONFIG_CMA
-            if (PageHuge(page)) {
-                int page_mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
-                struct compact_control cc = {
-                    .nr_migratepages = 0,
-                    .order = -1,
-                    .zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(head_pfn)),
-                    .mode = MIGRATE_SYNC,
-                    .ignore_skip_hint = true,
-                    .no_set_skip_hint = true,
-                    .gfp_mask = gfp_flags,
-                    .alloc_contig = true,
-                };
-                INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cc.migratepages);
-
-                ret = __alloc_contig_migrate_range(&cc, head_pfn,
-                            head_pfn + nr_pages, page_mt);
-                if (ret)
-                    goto failed;

But won't this break alloc_contig_range() then? I would have expected that you have to special-case here on the migration reason (MEMORY_OFFLINE).


Yes, this is what I did in rfc, only skip migration for offline path.
but Zi Yan suggested to remove migration totally[1]

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/50FEEE33-49CA-48B5-B4C5-964F1BE25D43@xxxxxxxxxx/

I remember some dirty details when we're trying to allcoate with a single pageblock for alloc_contig_range().

Note that memory offlining always covers pageblocks large than MAX_ORDER chunks (which implies full pageblocks) but alloc_contig_range() + CMA might only cover (parts of) single pageblocks.

Hoping Zi Yan can review :)





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux