On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 1:14 PM Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Jeff Xu <jeffxu@xxxxxxxxxx> [240815 13:23]: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 9:50 AM Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > * Jeff Xu <jeffxu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [240814 23:46]: > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 12:55 PM Liam R. Howlett > > > > <Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > The majority of the comments to V2 are mine, you only told us that > > > > > splitting a sealed vma is wrong (after I asked you directly to answer) > > > > > and then you made a comment about testing of the patch set. Besides the > > > > > direct responses to me, your comment was "wait for me to test". > > > > > > > > > Please share this link for " Besides the direct responses to me, your > > > > comment was "wait for me to test". > > > > Or pop up that email by responding to it, to remind me. Thanks. > > > > > > [1]. > > > > That is responding to Andrew, to indicate V2 patch has dependency on > > arch_munmap in PPC. And I will review/test the code, I will respond to > > Andrew directly. > > > > PS Your statement above is entirely false, and out of context. > > > > " You only told us that splitting a sealed vma is wrong (after I asked > > you directly to answer) and then you made a comment about testing of > > the patch set. Besides the direct responses to me, your comment was > > "wait for me to test". > > [1] has your "wait for me to test" to hold up a patch set, [2] has you > answering my direct question to you and making the untested comment to > someone else. > This is the last time that I'm trying to clarify this. [1] is my response to Andrew and Pedro. [2] is my comments about V2 lack of test , i.e. no selftest change, no extra tests added. -Jeff > So, entirely true. > > Liam > > [1]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/CALmYWFs0v07z5vheDt1h3hD+3--yr6Va0ZuQeaATo+-8MuRJ-g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > [2]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/CALmYWFvURJBgyFw7x5qrL4CqoZjy92NeFAS750XaLxO7o7Cv9A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
