Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] uprobes: RCU-protected hot path optimizations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 6:25 AM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 08/12, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >
> > ( In addition to previously posted first 8 patches, I'm sending 5 more as an
> > RFC for people to get the general gist of where this work heading and what
> > uprobe performance is now achievable. I think first 8 patches are ready to be
> > applied and I'd appreciate early feedback on the remaining 5 ones.
>
> I didn't read the "RFC" patches yet, will try to do on weekend.
>
> As for 1-8, I failed to find any problem:
> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
>

Great, thanks a lot for all the thorough reviews you've provided (and
hopefully will keep providing ;).

Peter, if you don't see any problems with first 8 patches, could you
please apply them to tip/perf/core some time soon, so that subsequent
work (SRCU+timeout and, separately, lockless VMA->inode->uprobe
lookup) can be split into independent pieces and reviewed/landed
separately? Thanks!





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux