Hi Fuad, On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 10:01 +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote: > Implement kvm_arch_has_private_mem() in arm64, making it > dependent on the configuration option. > > Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > index 36b8e97bf49e..8f7d78ee9557 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h > @@ -1414,4 +1414,7 @@ bool kvm_arm_vcpu_stopped(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); > (pa + pi + pa3) == 1; \ > }) > > +#define kvm_arch_has_private_mem(kvm) \ > + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM) && is_protected_kvm_enabled()) > + Would it make sense to have some ARM equivalent of KVM_X86_SW_PROTECTED_VM here? Both for easier testing of guest_memfd on ARM, as well as for future non-coco usecases. > #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ */ > -- > 2.46.0.rc1.232.g9752f9e123-goog > Best, Patrick
