On Wed, 7 Aug 2024, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> index 40b582a014b..1abe6a577d5 100644
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,19 @@ unsigned int kmem_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *s)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_size);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> +
> +static bool kmem_cache_is_duplicate_name(const char *name)
> +{
> + struct kmem_cache *s;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(s, &slab_caches, list) {
> + if (!strcmp(s->name, name))
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static int kmem_cache_sanity_check(const char *name, unsigned int size)
> {
> if (!name || in_interrupt() || size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE) {
> @@ -95,6 +108,11 @@ static int kmem_cache_sanity_check(const char *name, unsigned int size)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (kmem_cache_is_duplicate_name(name)) {
> + /* Duplicate names will confuse slabtop, et al */
> + pr_warn("%s: name %s already exists as a cache\n", __func__, name);
Shouldn't this be a full WARN_ON() instead of pr_warn()? I assume we'll
be interested in who is adding the cache when the name already exists.
