On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 15:34 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
>> +struct rb_augment_callbacks {
>> + void (*propagate)(struct rb_node *node, struct rb_node *stop);
>> + void (*copy)(struct rb_node *old, struct rb_node *new);
>> + void (*rotate)(struct rb_node *old, struct rb_node *new);
>> +};
>
> Should we make that const pointers? Daniel?
I don't think it would hurt, but note that each function taking this
as an argument takes it as a const struct rb_augment_callbacks *, so I
doubt the extra consts would help either.
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>