Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] mm: Optimize mseal checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 5:34 PM Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 12:12 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed,  7 Aug 2024 22:13:03 +0100 Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > This series also depends on (and will eventually very slightly conflict with)
> > > the powerpc series that removes arch_unmap[2].
> >
> > That's awkward.  Please describe the dependency?
>
> One of the transformations done in this patch series (patch 2) assumes
> that arch_unmap either doesn't exist or does nothing.
> PPC is the only architecture with an arch_unmap implementation, and
> through the series I linked they're going to make it work via
> ->close().
>
> What's the easiest way to deal with this? Can the PPC series go
> through the mm tree?
>
This patch can't be merged until arch_unmap() is all removed (ppc change)

Also I'm still doing a test/reviewing for this patch,  perhaps it is
better to wait till my test is done.

Thanks
-Jeff





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux