On 07/08/2024 21:02, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 02:46:47PM +0100, Usama Arif wrote:
>> @@ -177,13 +177,56 @@ void putback_movable_pages(struct list_head *l)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static bool try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(struct page_vma_mapped_walk *pvmw,
>> + struct folio *folio,
>> + unsigned long idx)
>> +{
>> + struct page *page = folio_page(folio, idx);
>> + bool contains_data;
>> + pte_t newpte;
>> + void *addr;
>> +
>> + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageCompound(page), page);
>> + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageAnon(page), page);
>> + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
>> + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(pte_present(*pvmw->pte), page);
>> +
>> + if (PageMlocked(page) || (pvmw->vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The pmd entry mapping the old thp was flushed and the pte mapping
>> + * this subpage has been non present. If the subpage is only zero-filled
>> + * then map it to the shared zeropage.
>> + */
>> + addr = kmap_local_page(page);
>> + contains_data = memchr_inv(addr, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
>> + kunmap_local(addr);
>> +
>> + if (contains_data || mm_forbids_zeropage(pvmw->vma->vm_mm))
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + newpte = pte_mkspecial(pfn_pte(page_to_pfn(ZERO_PAGE(pvmw->address)),
>> + pvmw->vma->vm_page_prot));
>
> Why not use my_zero_pfn() here? On many configurations this just
> returns zero_pfn and avoids the indirection through mem_map.
>
>> @@ -904,7 +958,7 @@ static int writeout(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio)
>> * At this point we know that the migration attempt cannot
>> * be successful.
>> */
>> - remove_migration_ptes(folio, folio, false);
>> + remove_migration_ptes(folio, folio, false, false);
>
> bool params are not great for callsite readability.
>
> How about a flags parameter and using names?
>
> enum rmp_flags {
> RMP_LOCKED = 1 << 0,
> RMP_ZEROPAGES = 1 << 1,
> }
Thanks! Will include both of the above changes in the next revision.
