On 2024/8/6 0:31, Aruna Ramakrishna wrote:
Convert alloc_pages_noprof() to use folio_alloc_mpol_noprof() so that
alloc_pages_mpol(_noprof)() can be removed in a future commit.
Signed-off-by: Aruna Ramakrishna <aruna.ramakrishna@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index b3b5f376471f..2d367ef15d0f 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2332,6 +2332,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vma_alloc_folio_noprof);
struct page *alloc_pages_noprof(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order)
{
struct mempolicy *pol = &default_policy;
+ struct folio *folio;
/*
* No reference counting needed for current->mempolicy
@@ -2340,8 +2341,10 @@ struct page *alloc_pages_noprof(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order)
if (!in_interrupt() && !(gfp & __GFP_THISNODE))
pol = get_task_policy(current);
- return alloc_pages_mpol_noprof(gfp, order, pol, NO_INTERLEAVE_INDEX,
- numa_node_id());
+ folio = folio_alloc_mpol_noprof(gfp, order, pol, NO_INTERLEAVE_INDEX,
+ numa_node_id());
We have __GFP_COMP in folio_alloc_mpol_noprof and set large_rmappable
for large folio, not sure that there is some issue for alloc_pages()
callers.
+
+ return &folio->page;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_pages_noprof);
base-commit: 2b820b576dfc4aa9b65f18b68f468cb5b38ece84
