On August 6, 2024 7:36:40 AM GMT+03:00, Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Since this touches arch/x86/, can an x86 maintainer review this? I can >carry this via the execve tree... No, we can't until the smoke from the handwaving clears: >> While not explicitly stated, it can be argued that it >> should be a SIGBUS, for consistency and for the benefit of the userspace >> signal handlers. Even if the process cannot handle the signal, perhaps >> the parent process can. This was the case in the scenario that >> motivated this patch. I have no clue what that is trying to tell me. -- Sent from a small device: formatting sucks and brevity is inevitable.
