Hello,
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 12:20:02AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 08/03/2012 11:48 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:41:34PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> I forgot to comment on that one, sorry.
> >>
> >> If we put hash entries after struct hash_table we don't take the
> >> bits field size into account, or did I miss something?
> >
> > So, if you do the following,
> >
> > struct {
> > struct {
> > int i;
> > long ar[];
> > } B;
> > long __ar_storage[32];
> > } A;
>
> struct A should have been an union, right?
I actually meant an enclosing struct. When you're defining a struct
member, simply putting the storage after a struct with var array
should be good enough. If that doesn't work, quite a few things in
the kernel will break.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>