On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/03/2012 10:02 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> >> On Thu 02-08-12 14:24:24, Ying Han wrote: > > shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc); >>> >>> >>> + if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) >>> + over_softlimit = true; >>> + } >>> + >> >> >> I think this is still not sufficient because you do not want to hammer >> root in the ignore_softlimit case. > > > Michal, please see my mail from a few days ago, describing how I > plan to balance pressure between the various LRU lists. > > I hope to throw a prototype patch over the wall soon... I assume this patch is still needed for your later ones, where your patch will help to balance the pressure better after start reclaiming. --Ying > > -- > All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>