Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: introduce MADV_DEMOTE/MADV_PROMOTE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01.08.24 21:25, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 15:56:10 +0800 BiscuitOS Broiler <zhang.renze@xxxxxxx> wrote:

From: BiscuitOS Broiler <zhang.renze@xxxxxxx>

Please use a real name.

 From Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:

: then you just add a line saying::
:
: 	Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
:
: using a known identity (sorry, no anonymous contributions.)



I'm curious, reading d4563201f33a022fc0353033d9dfeb1606a88330, pseudonyms are allowed now as long as we are dealing with a "known identity".

"Real name" was replaced by "known identity" in that commit.

I'm pretty much in favor of people just using their real name here as well. But apparently, "knwon identity" is sufficient. Not that I could tell when someone is a "known identity". Likely "BiscuitOS Broiler" would be a known identity and not "anonymous"?

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux