Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] mm/dax: Dump start address in fault handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15.07.24 21:21, Peter Xu wrote:
Currently the dax fault handler dumps the vma range when dynamic debugging
enabled.  That's mostly not useful.  Dump the (aligned) address instead
with the order info.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/dax/device.c | 6 +++---
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dax/device.c b/drivers/dax/device.c
index eb61598247a9..714174844ca5 100644
--- a/drivers/dax/device.c
+++ b/drivers/dax/device.c
@@ -235,9 +235,9 @@ static vm_fault_t dev_dax_huge_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned int order)
  	int id;
  	struct dev_dax *dev_dax = filp->private_data;
- dev_dbg(&dev_dax->dev, "%s: %s (%#lx - %#lx) order:%d\n", current->comm,
-			(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) ? "write" : "read",
-			vmf->vma->vm_start, vmf->vma->vm_end, order);
+	dev_dbg(&dev_dax->dev, "%s: op=%s addr=%#lx order=%d\n", current->comm,
+		(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) ? "write" : "read",
+		vmf->address & ~((1UL << (order + PAGE_SHIFT)) - 1), order);
id = dax_read_lock();
  	if (order == 0)

Agreed, the address of the fault is better. Just wondering, would the unmasked address be even better? Using the order we can figure out the to-be-aligned address.

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux