[no subject]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Furthermore, for latency-insensitive applications, we can keep the default
setting for better throughput. In our production environment, we set this
value to 0 for applications running on Kubernetes servers while keeping it
at the default value of 5 for other applications like big data. It's not
common to release individual kernel packages for each application.

Future work
===========

To ultimately mitigate the zone->lock contention issue, several suggestions
have been proposed. One approach involves dividing large zones into multi
smaller zones, as suggested by Matthew[2], while another entails splitting
the zone->lock using a mechanism similar to memory arenas and shifting away
from relying solely on zone_id to identify the range of free lists a
particular page belongs to, as suggested by Mel[3]. However, implementing
these solutions is likely to necessitate a more extended development
effort.

Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/981069/ [0]
Link: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/blob/master/tools/funclatency.py [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ZnTrZ9mcAIRodnjx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240705130943.htsyhhhzbcptnkcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ [3]
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 mm/Kconfig                              | 11 -----------
 mm/page_alloc.c                         | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst
index e86c968a7a0e..aa29f2fdad7c 100644
--- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ Currently, these files are in /proc/sys/vm:
 - page-cluster
 - page_lock_unfairness
 - panic_on_oom
+- pcp_batch_scale_max
 - percpu_pagelist_high_fraction
 - stat_interval
 - stat_refresh
@@ -845,6 +846,22 @@ panic_on_oom=2+kdump gives you very strong tool to investigate
 why oom happens. You can get snapshot.
 
 
+pcp_batch_scale_max
+===================
+
+In page allocator, PCP (Per-CPU pageset) is refilled and drained in
+batches.  The batch number is scaled automatically to improve page
+allocation/free throughput.  But too large scale factor may hurt
+latency.  This option sets the upper limit of scale factor to limit
+the maximum latency.
+
+The range for this parameter spans from 0 to 6, with a default value of 5.
+The value assigned to 'N' signifies that during each refilling or draining
+process, a maximum of (batch << N) pages will be involved, where "batch"
+represents the default batch size automatically computed by the kernel for
+each zone.
+
+
 percpu_pagelist_high_fraction
 =============================
 
diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
index b4cb45255a54..41fe4c13b7ac 100644
--- a/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/mm/Kconfig
@@ -663,17 +663,6 @@ config HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_VARIABLE
 config CONTIG_ALLOC
 	def_bool (MEMORY_ISOLATION && COMPACTION) || CMA
 
-config PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX
-	int "Maximum scale factor of PCP (Per-CPU pageset) batch allocate/free"
-	default 5
-	range 0 6
-	help
-	  In page allocator, PCP (Per-CPU pageset) is refilled and drained in
-	  batches.  The batch number is scaled automatically to improve page
-	  allocation/free throughput.  But too large scale factor may hurt
-	  latency.  This option sets the upper limit of scale factor to limit
-	  the maximum latency.
-
 config PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
 	def_bool 64BIT
 
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index bfd44b65777c..8d6f9dc99387 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -273,6 +273,8 @@ int min_free_kbytes = 1024;
 int user_min_free_kbytes = -1;
 static int watermark_boost_factor __read_mostly = 15000;
 static int watermark_scale_factor = 10;
+static int pcp_batch_scale_max = 5;
+static int sysctl_6 = 6;
 
 /* movable_zone is the "real" zone pages in ZONE_MOVABLE are taken from */
 int movable_zone;
@@ -2334,7 +2336,7 @@ static void drain_pages_zone(unsigned int cpu, struct zone *zone)
 	int count = READ_ONCE(pcp->count);
 
 	while (count) {
-		int to_drain = min(count, pcp->batch << CONFIG_PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX);
+		int to_drain = min(count, pcp->batch << pcp_batch_scale_max);
 		count -= to_drain;
 
 		spin_lock(&pcp->lock);
@@ -2462,7 +2464,7 @@ static int nr_pcp_free(struct per_cpu_pages *pcp, int batch, int high, bool free
 
 	/* Free as much as possible if batch freeing high-order pages. */
 	if (unlikely(free_high))
-		return min(pcp->count, batch << CONFIG_PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX);
+		return min(pcp->count, batch << pcp_batch_scale_max);
 
 	/* Check for PCP disabled or boot pageset */
 	if (unlikely(high < batch))
@@ -2494,7 +2496,7 @@ static int nr_pcp_high(struct per_cpu_pages *pcp, struct zone *zone,
 		return 0;
 
 	if (unlikely(free_high)) {
-		pcp->high = max(high - (batch << CONFIG_PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX),
+		pcp->high = max(high - (batch << pcp_batch_scale_max),
 				high_min);
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -2564,9 +2566,9 @@ static void free_unref_page_commit(struct zone *zone, struct per_cpu_pages *pcp,
 	} else if (pcp->flags & PCPF_PREV_FREE_HIGH_ORDER) {
 		pcp->flags &= ~PCPF_PREV_FREE_HIGH_ORDER;
 	}
-	if (pcp->free_count < (batch << CONFIG_PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX))
+	if (pcp->free_count < (batch << pcp_batch_scale_max))
 		pcp->free_count = min(pcp->free_count + (1 << order),
-				      batch << CONFIG_PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX);
+				      batch << pcp_batch_scale_max);
 	high = nr_pcp_high(pcp, zone, batch, free_high);
 	if (pcp->count >= high) {
 		free_pcppages_bulk(zone, nr_pcp_free(pcp, batch, high, free_high),
@@ -2908,7 +2910,7 @@ static int nr_pcp_alloc(struct per_cpu_pages *pcp, struct zone *zone, int order)
 		 * subsequent allocation of order-0 pages without any freeing.
 		 */
 		if (batch <= max_nr_alloc &&
-		    pcp->alloc_factor < CONFIG_PCP_BATCH_SCALE_MAX)
+		    pcp->alloc_factor < pcp_batch_scale_max)
 			pcp->alloc_factor++;
 		batch = min(batch, max_nr_alloc);
 	}
@@ -6275,6 +6277,15 @@ static struct ctl_table page_alloc_sysctl_table[] = {
 		.proc_handler	= percpu_pagelist_high_fraction_sysctl_handler,
 		.extra1		= SYSCTL_ZERO,
 	},
+	{
+		.procname	= "pcp_batch_scale_max",
+		.data		= &pcp_batch_scale_max,
+		.maxlen		= sizeof(pcp_batch_scale_max),
+		.mode		= 0644,
+		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_minmax,
+		.extra1		= SYSCTL_ZERO,
+		.extra2		= &sysctl_6,
+	},
 	{
 		.procname	= "lowmem_reserve_ratio",
 		.data		= &sysctl_lowmem_reserve_ratio,
-- 
2.43.5





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux