On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:51:31PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 08/02/2012 08:42 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:06:41AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
> >>
> >>> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> >>> index e517d43..9ca4e20 100644
> >>> --- a/mm/slub.c
> >>> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> >>> @@ -3453,7 +3453,7 @@ void kfree(const void *x)
> >>> if (unlikely(!PageSlab(page))) {
> >>> BUG_ON(!PageCompound(page));
> >>> kmemleak_free(x);
> >>> - put_page(page);
> >>> + __free_pages(page, compound_order(page));
> >>
> >> Hmmm... put_page would have called put_compound_page(). which would have
> >> called the dtor function. dtor is set to __free_pages() ok which does
> >> mlock checks and verifies that the page is in a proper condition for
> >> freeing. Then it calls free_one_page().
> >>
> >> __free_pages() decrements the refcount and then calls __free_pages_ok().
> >>
> >> So we loose the checking and the dtor stuff with this patch. Guess that is
> >> ok?
> >
> > The changelog is not correct, however. People DO get pages underlying
> > slab objects and even free the slab objects before returning the page.
> > See recent fix:
>
> Well, yes, in the sense that slab objects are page-backed.
>
> The point is that a user of kmalloc/kfree should not treat a memory area
> as if it were a page, even if it is page-sized.
I whole-heartedly agree. But it's hard to verify there aren't any
doing that. And even though it's ugly to do, it's technically
working, no? No longer supporting it would be a regression.
> If it is just the Changelog you are unhappy about, I can do another
> submission rewording it.
__free_pages still respects the refcount, so I think the Changelog is
not actually appropriate for the change you're making. You're just
changing what Christoph outlined above, the compound page handling.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>