Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: page_counters: initialize usage using ATOMIC_LONG_INIT() macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 08:31:10PM +0000, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> When a page_counter structure is initialized, there is no need to
> use an atomic set operation to initialize the usage counter because
> at this point the structure is not visible to anybody else.
> ATOMIC_LONG_INIT() is what should be used in such cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/page_counter.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/page_counter.h b/include/linux/page_counter.h
> index cf837d0f8ed1..5da11392b382 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page_counter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page_counter.h
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static inline void page_counter_init(struct page_counter *counter,
>  				     struct page_counter *parent,
>  				     bool protection_support)
>  {
> -	atomic_long_set(&counter->usage, 0);
> +	counter->usage = (atomic_long_t)ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0);

Pretty cool that ATOMIC_LONG_INIT() return value needs a cast to
atomic_long_t! ^_^

Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux