Re: Common [00/16] Sl[auo]b: Common code rework V8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/02/2012 06:13 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
> 
>> After applying v8, and proceeding with cache deletion + later insertion
>> as I've previously laid down, I can still see the bug I mentioned here.
>>
>> I am attaching the backtrace I've got with SLUB_DEBUG_ON. My first guess
>> based on it would be a double free somewhere.
> 
> This looks like you are passing an invalid pointer to kfree.
> 

Which is then the patchset's fault. Since as I said, my call order is:

kmem_cache_create() -> kmem_cache_destroy().

All allocs and frees are implicit.

It also works okay both before the patches are applied, and with slab.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]