Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] task_stack: uninline stack_not_used

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] task_stack: uninline stack_not_used
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 13:50:58 -0700
Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx, kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx, cerasuolodomenico@xxxxxxxxx, surenb@xxxxxxxxxx, lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx, willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, vbabka@xxxxxxx, ziy@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240724203322.2765486-4-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
References: <20240724203322.2765486-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> <20240724203322.2765486-4-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 08:33:22PM GMT, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> Given that stack_not_used() is not performance critical function
> uninline it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] task_stack: uninline stack_not_used
  - From: Pasha Tatashin

References:
- [PATCH v5 0/3] Kernel stack usage histogram
  - From: Pasha Tatashin
- [PATCH v5 3/3] task_stack: uninline stack_not_used
  - From: Pasha Tatashin

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] vmstat: Kernel stack usage histogram
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: memcg: don't call propagate_protected_usage() needlessly
Previous by thread: [PATCH v5 3/3] task_stack: uninline stack_not_used
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] task_stack: uninline stack_not_used
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux