On Wed 24-07-24 20:55:44, Barry Song wrote: > From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx> > > GFP_NOFAIL includes the meaning of block and direct reclamation, which > is essential for a true no-fail allocation. We are gradually starting > to enforce this block semantics to prevent the potential misuse of > __GFP_NOFAIL in atomic contexts in the future. > > A typical example of incorrect usage is in VDPA, where GFP_ATOMIC > and __GFP_NOFAIL are used together. Ohh, so you have done the migration. Please squash those two patches. Also if we want to preserve clean __GFP_NOFAIL for internal MM use then it should be moved away from include/linux/gfp_types.h. But is there any real use for that? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
