On 08/01/2012 08:09 PM, Ying Han wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Rik van Riel<riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08/01/2012 03:04 PM, Ying Han wrote:
That is true. Hmm, then two things i can do:
1. for kswapd case, make sure not counting the root cgroup
2. or check nr_scanned. I like the nr_scanned which is telling us
whether or not the reclaim ever make any attempt ?
I am looking at a more advanced case of (3) right
now. Once I have the basics working, I will send
you a prototype (that applies on top of your patches)
to play with.
Rik,
Thank you for looking into that. Before I dig into the algorithm you
described here, do you think we need to hold this patchset for that?
It would be easier to build on top of the things after the ground work
is sorted out.
I'm fine either way.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>