On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:24:32PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > On 08/01/2012 08:21 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:19:52PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > >> If we switch to using functions, we could no longer hide it anywhere > >> (we'd need to either turn the buckets into a struct, or have the > >> user pass it around to all functions). > > > > Create an outer struct hash_table which remembers the size? > > Possible. I just wanted to avoid creating new structs where they're not really required. > > Do you think it's worth it for eliminating those two macros? What if someone wants to allocate hashtable dynamically which isn't too unlikely? I think it's best to stay away from macro tricks as much as possible although I gotta admit I fall into the macro trap more often than I would like. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>