On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 11:05 AM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I have always thought that the shrinker should play this role in one > way or another. Instead of an arbitrary watermark and asynchronous > work, it incrementally pushes the zswap LRU toward disk as reclaim > activity increases. > > Is the point behind proactive shrinking is to reduce the latency in > the reclaim path? Yeah, reducing latency is the one benefit I have in mind :) I don't feel too strongly regarding this though - in fact I'm more biased towards the other shrinker in the first place.
