On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:19:16AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:58:43AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > So in my head I feel that it is Ok to: > > 1) address the concerns that zcache has before it is unstaged > > 2) rip out the two-engine system with a one-engine system > > (and see how well it behaves) > > 3) sysfs->debugfs as needed > > 4) other things as needed > > > > I think we are getting hung-up what Greg said about adding features > > and the two-engine->one engine could be understood as that. > > While I think that is part of a staging effort to clean up the > > existing issues. Lets see what Greg thinks. > > Greg has no idea, except I want to see the needed fixups happen before > new features get added. Add the new features _after_ it is out of > staging. I think we (that is me, Seth, Minchan, Dan) need to talk to have a good understanding of what each of us thinks are fixups. Would Monday Aug 6th at 1pm EST on irc.freenode.net channel #zcache work for people? > > greg k-h -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>