On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 06:38:11PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > Hi, > > This is the slab part of the kmem limitation mechanism in its last form. I > would like to have comments on it to see if we can agree in its form. I > consider it mature, since it doesn't change much in essence over the last > forms. However, I would still prefer to defer merging it and merge the > stack-only patchset first (even if inside the same merge window). That patchset > contains most of the infrastructure needed here, and merging them separately > would not only reduce the complexity for reviewers, but allow us a chance to > have independent testing on them both. I would also likely benefit from some > extra testing, to make sure the recent changes didn't introduce anything bad. What is the status of the stack-only limitation patchset BTW? Does anybody oppose to its merging? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>