On Fri, 27 Jul 2012 22:45:04 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Unless Aneesh has another reason for the patch, it should be reverted > > to preserve hugetlb page sharing locking. > > > > I guess we want to take this patch as a revert patch rather than > dropping the one in -mm. That would help in documenting the i_mmap_mutex > locking details in commit message. Or may be we should add necessary > comments around the locking ? Code comments would be better if possible - we shouldn't force people to dig around in git history to understand small code snippets. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>