Re: [PATCH v2] list corruption by gather_surp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 27-07-12 17:32:15, Cliff Wickman wrote:
> From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@xxxxxxx>
> 
> v2: diff'd against linux-next
> 
> I am seeing list corruption occurring from within gather_surplus_pages()
> (mm/hugetlb.c).  The problem occurs in a RHEL6 kernel under a heavy load,
> and seems to be because this function drops the hugetlb_lock.
> The list_add() in gather_surplus_pages() seems to need to be protected by
> the lock.
> (I don't have a similar test for a linux-next kernel)

Because you cannot reproduce or you just didn't test it with linux-next?

> I have CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST=y, and am running an MPI application with 64 threads
> and a library that creates a large heap of hugetlbfs pages for it.
> 
> The below patch fixes the problem.
> The gist of this patch is that gather_surplus_pages() does not have to drop

But you cannot hold spinlock while allocating memory because the
allocation is not atomic and you could deadlock easily.

> the lock if alloc_buddy_huge_page() is told whether the lock is already held.

The changelog doesn't actually explain how does the list gets corrupted.
alloc_buddy_huge_page doesn't provide the freshly allocated page to use
so nobody could get and free it. enqueue_huge_page happens under hugetlb_lock.
I am sorry but I do not see how we could race here.


> Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c |   29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux/mm/hugetlb.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ linux/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -838,7 +838,9 @@ static int free_pool_huge_page(struct hs
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static struct page *alloc_buddy_huge_page(struct hstate *h, int nid)
> +/* already_locked means the caller has already locked hugetlb_lock */
> +static struct page *alloc_buddy_huge_page(struct hstate *h, int nid,
> +						int already_locked)
>  {
>  	struct page *page;
>  	unsigned int r_nid;
> @@ -869,15 +871,19 @@ static struct page *alloc_buddy_huge_pag
>  	 * the node values until we've gotten the hugepage and only the
>  	 * per-node value is checked there.
>  	 */
> -	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +	if (!already_locked)
> +		spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +
>  	if (h->surplus_huge_pages >= h->nr_overcommit_huge_pages) {
> -		spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +		if (!already_locked)
> +			spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>  		return NULL;
>  	} else {
>  		h->nr_huge_pages++;
>  		h->surplus_huge_pages++;
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +	/* page allocation may sleep, so the lock must be unlocked */
>  
>  	if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
>  		page = alloc_pages(htlb_alloc_mask|__GFP_COMP|
> @@ -910,7 +916,8 @@ static struct page *alloc_buddy_huge_pag
>  		h->surplus_huge_pages--;
>  		__count_vm_event(HTLB_BUDDY_PGALLOC_FAIL);
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +	if (!already_locked)
> +		spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>  
>  	return page;
>  }
> @@ -929,7 +936,7 @@ struct page *alloc_huge_page_node(struct
>  	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>  
>  	if (!page)
> -		page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, nid);
> +		page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, nid, 0);
>  
>  	return page;
>  }
> @@ -937,6 +944,7 @@ struct page *alloc_huge_page_node(struct
>  /*
>   * Increase the hugetlb pool such that it can accommodate a reservation
>   * of size 'delta'.
> + * This is entered and exited with hugetlb_lock locked.
>   */
>  static int gather_surplus_pages(struct hstate *h, int delta)
>  {
> @@ -957,9 +965,8 @@ static int gather_surplus_pages(struct h
>  
>  	ret = -ENOMEM;
>  retry:
> -	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>  	for (i = 0; i < needed; i++) {
> -		page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> +		page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, NUMA_NO_NODE, 1);
>  		if (!page) {
>  			alloc_ok = false;
>  			break;
> @@ -969,10 +976,9 @@ retry:
>  	allocated += i;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * After retaking hugetlb_lock, we need to recalculate 'needed'
> +	 * With hugetlb_lock still locked, we need to recalculate 'needed'
>  	 * because either resv_huge_pages or free_huge_pages may have changed.
>  	 */
> -	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
>  	needed = (h->resv_huge_pages + delta) -
>  			(h->free_huge_pages + allocated);
>  	if (needed > 0) {
> @@ -1010,15 +1016,12 @@ retry:
>  		enqueue_huge_page(h, page);
>  	}
>  free:
> -	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> -
>  	/* Free unnecessary surplus pages to the buddy allocator */
>  	if (!list_empty(&surplus_list)) {
>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, &surplus_list, lru) {
>  			put_page(page);
>  		}
>  	}
> -	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -1151,7 +1154,7 @@ static struct page *alloc_huge_page(stru
>  		spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>  	} else {
>  		spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> -		page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> +		page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, NUMA_NO_NODE, 0);
>  		if (!page) {
>  			hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup(idx,
>  						       pages_per_huge_page(h),

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]