在 2024/7/8 20:41, Barry Song 写道:
zhiguojiang <justinjiang@xxxxxxxx> 于 2024年7月9日周二 00:25写道：
在 2024/7/8 20:17, zhiguojiang 写道:
>
>
> 在 2024/7/8 19:02, Barry Song 写道:
>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 9:04 PM Zhiguo Jiang <justinjiang@xxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> The releasing process of the non-shared anonymous folio mapped
>>> solely by
>>> an exiting process may go through two flows: 1) the anonymous
folio is
>>> firstly is swaped-out into swapspace and transformed into a
swp_entry
>>> in shrink_folio_list; 2) then the swp_entry is released in the
process
>>> exiting flow. This will increase the cpu load of releasing a
non-shared
>>> anonymous folio mapped solely by an exiting process, because
the folio
>>> go through swap-out and the releasing the swapspace and swp_entry.
>>>
>>> When system is low memory, it is more likely to occur, because
more
>>> backend applidatuions will be killed.
>>>
>>> The modification is that shrink skips the non-shared anonymous
folio
>>> solely mapped by an exting process and the folio is only released
>>> directly in the process exiting flow, which will save swap-out
time
>>> and alleviate the load of the process exiting.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Jiang <justinjiang@xxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Change log:
>>> v4->v5:
>>> 1.Modify to skip non-shared anonymous folio only.
>>> 2.Update comments for pra->referenced = -1.
>>> v3->v4:
>>> 1.Modify that the unshared folios mapped only in exiting task
are skip.
>>> v2->v3:
>>> Nothing.
>>> v1->v2:
>>> 1.The VM_EXITING added in v1 patch is removed, because it will
fail
>>> to compile in 32-bit system.
>>>
>>> mm/rmap.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>> mm/vmscan.c | 7 ++++++-
>>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
>>> index 26806b49a86f..5b5281d71dbb
>>> --- a/mm/rmap.c
>>> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
>>> @@ -843,6 +843,19 @@ static bool folio_referenced_one(struct
folio
>>> *folio,
>>> int referenced = 0;
>>> unsigned long start = address, ptes = 0;
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * Skip the non-shared anonymous folio mapped solely by
>>> + * the single exiting process, and release it directly
>>> + * in the process exiting.
>>> + */
>>> + if ((!atomic_read(&vma->vm_mm->mm_users) ||
>>> + test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &vma->vm_mm->flags)) &&
>>> + folio_test_anon(folio) &&
>>> folio_test_swapbacked(folio) &&
>>> + !folio_likely_mapped_shared(folio)) {
>>> + pra->referenced = -1;
>>> + return false;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
>>> address = pvmw.address;
> Sure, I agree with your modification suggestions. This way,
using PTL
> indeed sure
> that the folio is mapped by this process.
> Thanks
>> As David suggested, what about the below?
>>
>> @@ -883,6 +870,21 @@ static bool folio_referenced_one(struct folio
>> *folio,
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Skip the non-shared anonymous folio mapped
solely by
>> + * the single exiting process, and release it
directly
>> + * in the process exiting.
>> + */
>> + if ((!atomic_read(&vma->vm_mm->mm_users) ||
>> + test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP,
>> &vma->vm_mm->flags)) &&
>> + folio_test_anon(folio) &&
>> folio_test_swapbacked(folio) &&
>> + !folio_likely_mapped_shared(folio)) {
>> + pra->referenced = -1;
>> + page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (pvmw.pte) {
>> if (lru_gen_enabled() &&
>> pte_young(ptep_get(pvmw.pte))) {
>>
>>
>> By the way, I am not convinced that using test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP,
>> &vma->vm_mm->flags) is
>> correct (I think it is wrong). For example, global_init can
>> directly have it:
>> if (is_global_init(p)) {
>> can_oom_reap = false;
>> set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
>> pr_info("oom killer %d (%s) has mm
pinned by
>> %d (%s)\n",
>> task_pid_nr(victim),
>> victim->comm,
>> task_pid_nr(p), p->comm);
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> And exit_mmap() automatically has MMF_OOM_SKIP.
>>
>> What is the purpose of this check? Is there a better way to
determine
>> if a process is an
>> OOM target? What about check_stable_address_space() ?
> 1.Sorry, I overlook the situation with if (is_global_init(p)),
> MMF_OOM_SKIP is indeed not suitable.
>
> 2.check_stable_address_space() can indicate oom_reaper, but it
seems
> unable to identify the situation where the process exits normally.
> What about task_is_dying()? static inline bool
task_is_dying(void) {
> return tsk_is_oom_victim(current) ||
fatal_signal_pending(current) ||
> (current->flags & PF_EXITING); } Thanks
We can migrate task_is_dying() from mm/memcontrol.c to
include/linux/oom.h
> static inline bool task_is_dying(void)
> {
> return tsk_is_oom_victim(current) ||
fatal_signal_pending(current) ||
> (current->flags & PF_EXITING);
> }
no. current is kswapd.
Hi Barry,
It seems feasible for check_stable_address_space() replacing MMF_OOM_SKIP.
check_stable_address_space() can indicate oom kill, and
!atomic_read(&vma->vm_mm->mm_users)
can indicate the normal process exiting.
/*
* Skip the non-shared anonymous folio mapped solely by
* the single exiting process, and release it directly
* in the process exiting.
*/
if ((!atomic_read(&vma->vm_mm->mm_users) ||
check_stable_address_space(vma->vm_mm)) &&
folio_test_anon(folio) && folio_test_swapbacked(folio) &&
!folio_likely_mapped_shared(folio)) {
pra->referenced = -1;
page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
return false;
}
Thanks
Zhiguo
>>
>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> index 0761f91b407f..bae7a8bf6b3d
>>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> @@ -863,7 +863,12 @@ static enum folio_references
>>> folio_check_references(struct folio *folio,
>>> if (vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
>>> return FOLIOREF_ACTIVATE;
>>>
>>> - /* rmap lock contention: rotate */
>>> + /*
>>> + * There are two cases to consider.
>>> + * 1) Rmap lock contention: rotate.
>>> + * 2) Skip the non-shared anonymous folio mapped solely by
>>> + * the single exiting process.
>>> + */
>>> if (referenced_ptes == -1)
>>> return FOLIOREF_KEEP;
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.39.0
>>>
>> Thanks
>> Barry
>
