On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 9:08 PM David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > @@ -3253,8 +3259,9 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(struct page *page, struct list_head *list, > > i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping); > > out: > > xas_destroy(&xas); > > - if (is_thp) > > + if (order >= HPAGE_PMD_ORDER) > > We likely should be using "== HPAGE_PMD_ORDER" here, to be safe for the > future. I feel this might need to be separate since all other places are using folio_test_pmd_mappable() ? > > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> > > -- > Cheers, > > David / dhildenb >
