On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 05:10:14PM +0000, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote: > > > Yes, I will rename it to ZERO_PAGE_SZ_64K as you suggested. > > > > No. It needs a symbolic name that doesn't include the actual size. > > Maybe ZERO_PAGE_IO_MAX. Christoph suggested using SZ_64K to define > > it, not to include it in the name. > > Initially I kept the name as ZERO_FSB_PAGE as it is used to do sub-block > zeroing. But I know John from Oracle is already working on using it for > rt extent zeroing. So I will just go with ZERO_PAGE_IO_MAX for now. > Understood about the SZ_64K part. Thanks for the clarification. IOMAP_ZERO_PAGE_SIZE ? (I kind regret not going for just adding zero page as originally suggested, but then we'd keep arguing about the nr_vecs sizing and naming :))
