On 7/2/24 11:35, Andrew Morton wrote:
> But when people run older (or current) kernels on newer hardware, they
> will hit this. So a backport to cover 82721d8b25d7 ("x86/mm: Handle
> LAM on context switch") is needed.
>
> The series doesn't seem to be getting much traction so I can add it to
> mm.git's mm-unstable branch for wider testing, but it's clearly an x86
> tree thing.
I was really hoping Andy L would look at this since he suggested this
whole thing really.
I completely agree that this needs some wider testing. How about I pull
it into x86/mm so it gets some linux-next testing instead of having it
in mm-unstable? Maybe it'll also attract Andy's attention once it's in
there.
