Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: force allocating surplus hugepages on mempolicy allowed nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: force allocating surplus hugepages on mempolicy allowed nodes
From: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 15:11:32 -0400
Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Muchun Song <muchun.song@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240621175609.9658bb023d6271125c685af8@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20240621190050.mhxwb65zn37doegp@redhat.com> <20240621175609.9658bb023d6271125c685af8@linux-foundation.org>
User-agent: Mutt/2.2.12 (2023-09-09)

Hi Andrew,

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 05:56:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Should we backport this into -stable kernels?

sorry, stupid email server.

Yes, that would qualify for -stable kernels.

-- 
Aristeu

References:
- [PATCH] hugetlb: force allocating surplus hugepages on mempolicy allowed nodes
  - From: Aristeu Rozanski
- Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: force allocating surplus hugepages on mempolicy allowed nodes
  - From: Andrew Morton

Prev by Date: [PATCH 3/4] Docs/mm/index: rename 'Legacy Documentation' to 'Unsorted Documentation'
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: force allocating surplus hugepages on mempolicy allowed nodes
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2] hugetlb: force allocating surplus hugepages on mempolicy allowed nodes
Next by thread: [PATCH] ELF: fix kernel.randomize_va_space double read
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux