On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 03:30:57PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > <SNIP> > > All of the patches will apply to 3.0-stable but the ordering of the > > patches is such that applying them to 3.2-stable and 3.4-stable should > > be straight-forward. > > I can't find any of these that should have gone to 3.4-stable, given > that they all were included in 3.4 already, right? > Yes, you're right. At the time I wrote the changelog I had patches belonging to 3.5 included. I later decided to drop them until after 3.5 was out. It was potentially weird to have a 3.0-stable kernel with patches that were not in a released 3.x.0 kernel. Besides, they were very low priority. I forgot to update the changelog to match. > I've queued up the whole lot for the 3.0-stable tree, thanks so much for > providing them. > Thanks for reviewing them in detail and getting the flaws corrected. I expect it'll be a bit more smooth if/when I do something like this again. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>