On 07/25/2012 11:26 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 06:38:12PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> For the kmem slab controller, we need to record some extra
>> information in the kmem_cache structure.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
>> CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/linux/slab.h | 7 +++++++
>> include/linux/slab_def.h | 4 ++++
>> include/linux/slub_def.h | 3 +++
>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
>> index 0dd2dfa..3152bcd 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
>> @@ -177,6 +177,13 @@ unsigned int kmem_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *);
>> #define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN __alignof__(unsigned long long)
>> #endif
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>> +struct mem_cgroup_cache_params {
>> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>> + int id;
>> +};
>
> IIUC, we only need the id to make slab name unique. Why can't we embed
> the id to struct mem_cgroup? Is it possible to have multiple slabs with
> the same combination of type, size, and memcg?
>
Humm, The id does not serve this purpose (perhaps deserves a comment here)
The purpose of the id is that given a slab, we can access it's memcg
equivalent in constant time through the cache array in memcg.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>